- From: John Boyer <boyerj@ca.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 22:08:09 -0700
- To: public-forms@w3.org
- Cc: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
- Message-ID: <OFEBEBA26F.1E5C332F-ON88257612.001A662F-88257612.001C3689@ca.ibm.com>
Dear Forms Working Group, It is a great pleasure to inform you that XForms 1.1 was approved for advancement to proposed recommendation. We should be able to get a publication date of next Tuesday, and the review period will end on September 22. This will be the time to ensure that each of your AC reps fills out their vote on XForms 1.1 advancement to recommendation. Also, it is the time to prepare your testimonial for XForms 1.1 and get it approved by your company for inclusion in the release of the Recommendation. Steven and I were both on the call today, and our work was thoroughly scrutinized and fairly considered. The rigorous work put into preparing the materials need for advancement was both necessary and sufficient, and congratulations are due to each member of the working group as well as the community who helped us to create the fantastic technical product that is XForms 1.1. Steven, I noted that you took the action item to make the publication request. Thank you. Please do this tomorrow and cc me on the request; I'll be out of town next week and would like to see this go out before I leave, esp. since the publication date occurs while I am away. Since you are hours ahead of me, we will gain the advantage of timezones if there are any issues. The documents requiring publication are specifically: http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/specs/XForms1.1/index-all.html (file) http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/specs/XForms1.1/index-diff.html (file) http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/specs/XForms1.1/examples (full directory) http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/specs/XForms1.1/images (full directory) The pubrules check is all good, except it complains about three URLs. One is the URL to the very document, which will start working correctly when it is published. The other two are example URLs related to our "get weather" web service in the SOAP submission section. The pubrules checker is incorrectly identifying these as links and getting a 404. However, they do not appear as links in the document, so the pub request should indicate that these 404s should be ignored. Thank you, John M. Boyer, Ph.D. STSM, Interactive Documents and Web 2.0 Applications Chair, W3C Forms Working Group Workplace, Portal and Collaboration Software IBM Victoria Software Lab E-Mail: boyerj@ca.ibm.com Blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/JohnBoyer Blog RSS feed: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/rss/JohnBoyer?flavor=rssdw
Received on Friday, 14 August 2009 05:08:53 UTC