- From: Leigh L. Klotz, Jr. <Leigh.Klotz@Xerox.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 09:16:01 -0700
- To: dev-tech-xforms@lists.mozilla.org, public-forms@w3.org, dr.cw.ray@gmail.com
Carl, We discussed your xforms-hide issue today at the Forms WG meeting, based on a mail note I forwarded: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2008Jun/0035.html We agreed that the use case you describe is valuable and that a solution should reduce both authoring and execution complexity. We did not reach consensus on your specific proposal of xforms-hide, but we did agree to keep the use case on hand to test other, more general ideas we have on the table for future versions. Additionally, we agreed to add to XForms 2.0 a case() XPath function to parallel the repeat index() XPath function. Note that there is already a way in XForms 1.1 to use toggle to specify a computed case: http://www.w3.org/TR/xforms11/#action-toggle-case and the proposed case() XPath function would be the dual of this toggle/case element, returning the currently selected case for the indicated switch. We believe that with switch/case and toggle, it should be possible to convert this from an 26*4 problem to a 1*4 problem. However, we agree that a solution that allows the author to be more expressive would be better, and will be using this use case to test more general solutions we already have planned for higher-order expression. Thank you, Leigh. <https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-xforms>
Received on Wednesday, 17 September 2008 16:16:37 UTC