- From: Erik Bruchez <ebruchez@orbeon.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 00:08:54 -0800
- To: Forms WG <public-forms@w3.org>
Prefer XFormsA, can live with FormsA. -Erik On Nov 16, 2008, at 11:27 PM, John Boyer wrote: > > The resolution on our last telecon about the name of the > "streamlined syntax" spec was, I think, about deciding not to use > the name WebFormsA more so than selecting the name FormsA in > particular, though there was some support for that name. > > There was a "typo" in my last post of this straw poll request, which > prevented it from reaching this list, so I am posting it again. > > The two names that seem to be popular are FormsA and XFormsA. In > the interest of getting quickly to a first public working draft, I > would like to ask the group to table consideration of names other > than these two. Please respond to this email to indicate your > preferences according to the questions below. If you don't respond > by next telecon and are not on the next telecon, we will have to > assume you are happy with whichever decision results from the > feedback provided by those who do respond. Please respond to this > email even if you have made your preference known in the past. > > Here is the question: > > For the name XFormsA, please characterize your preference: > Prefer > Support / Can Live With > Oppose > > For the name FormsA, please characterize your preference: > Prefer > Support / Can Live With > Oppose > > Thank you, > John M. Boyer, Ph.D. > STSM, Interactive Documents and Web 2.0 Applications > Chair, W3C Forms Working Group > Workplace, Portal and Collaboration Software > IBM Victoria Software Lab > E-Mail: boyerj@ca.ibm.com > > Blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/JohnBoyer > Blog RSS feed: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/rss/JohnBoyer?flavor=rssdw -- Orbeon Forms - Web Forms for the Enterprise Done the Right Way http://www.orbeon.com/
Received on Monday, 17 November 2008 08:09:37 UTC