W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-forms@w3.org > February 2008

Re: [access-control] Forms WG comments on Access Control WD

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 11:53:32 +0100
To: "Klotz, Leigh" <Leigh.Klotz@xerox.com>, public-appformats@w3.org
Cc: "Forms WG" <public-forms@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.t55hvi0m64w2qv@annevk-t60.oslo.opera.com>

On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 23:40:37 +0100, Klotz, Leigh <Leigh.Klotz@xerox.com>  
> Therefore, we believe that recommendations to XForms user agent authors  
> are in order.  (We note that the fact that XForms cross-site access is  
> supported by some implementations was discussed at the 2007/11/05 WAF  
> meeting [1].)

Yes. The idea is that specifications that use the mechanism have a set of  
user agent requirements for non same-origin requests.

> The Forms WG has directed me to make the following two requests:
> Request 1:
> The Forms WG requests that the WAF WG include in the next Working Draft  
> Introduction a mention of XForms submission, to supplement the current  
> list of XMLHttpRequest, XBL 2.0, and HTML 5.   Text for corresponding  
> sections, if required, can be TBD (see request 2).

For the mentioned specifications we have drafts that actually point out  
Access Control as a solution. We don't have that for XForms yet or XSLT  
for that matter.

> Request 2:
> The Forms WG would like to continue to work with a representative from  
> WAF to develop a joint proposal for taking advantage of access control  
> in XForms.  The goal would be to develop the following:
> - text for the access-control WD section on use case and goals for  
> XForms integration

Why do you think more text for the access-control document is needed?

> - best practice for taking advantage of access-control in XForms 1.1
> As noted in Requirement 10 of your current WD, it's likely that no  
> changes to markup XForms markup will be required.  However, the XForms  
> WG or WAF (or both) may choose to issue a note offering guidance to user  
> agent implementers.
> I've been assigned to work with WAF on this issue for the Forms WG.
> We ask that WAF nominate a member to work with me to help achieve these  
> goals.

I'm willing to take a look at what's drafted for the XForms specification  
to make sure it uses Access Control correctly. If more is needed maybe Art  
can suggest someone.

Anne van Kesteren
Received on Thursday, 7 February 2008 10:50:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:48:28 UTC