- From: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com>
- Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 12:58:23 +0100
- To: public-forms <public-forms@w3.org>
Hello all,
I was just looking something up in the spec, and noticed that if
@control is omitted from the use of xf:setfocus then nothing happens.
It occurred to me that omitting @control and defaulting to the event
target might actually be a useful pattern.
This example is a little contrived, because I've only just thought of
the whole thing, but bear with me....
Ordinarily, setting focus on a control when it is invalid could be
done like this:
<xf:input id="me" ref="x">
<xf:label>X:</xf:label>
<xf:setfocus control="me" ev:event="xforms-invalid" />
</xf:input>
But that requires naming the control with an @id, and then ensuring
that the @control value and the control name are in sync. An easier
and more maintainable way would be:
<xf:input ref="x">
<xf:label>X:</xf:label>
<xf:setfocus ev:event="xforms-invalid" />
</xf:input>
If people don't like simply omitting @control, an alternative would be:
<xf:input ref="x">
<xf:label>X:</xf:label>
<xf:setfocus control="" ev:event="xforms-invalid" />
</xf:input>
Regards,
Mark
--
Mark Birbeck, webBackplane
mark.birbeck@webBackplane.com
http://webBackplane.com/mark-birbeck
webBackplane is a trading name of Backplane Ltd. (company number
05972288, registered office: 2nd Floor, 69/85 Tabernacle Street,
London, EC2A 4RR)
Received on Friday, 8 August 2008 11:58:57 UTC