RE: Erratum that removed the sending of MIP related events on model-construct

Not at all a problem; we should be looking at the use cases, in order to
figure out which features work and which ones don't. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Joern Turner [mailto:joern.turner@dreamlab.net] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2007 1:59 AM
To: Klotz, Leigh
Cc: Nick_Van_den_Bleeken@inventivegroup.com; public-forms
Subject: Re: Erratum that removed the sending of MIP related events on
model-construct

Hi Leigh, Erik and all,

sorry for my rather harsh statement about MIP event usefulness. I didn't

really intended to propose the removal of the MIP events but to rather 
validate their use cases. Ok, you've mentioned a few ones and that 
should be enough to convince us that we don't touch the MIP events.

Joern

Klotz, Leigh wrote:
> Here's one exposition of a use case for xforms-enabled or
> xforms-value-changed (your choice):
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-forms/2006Apr/0056.html
> 
> Leigh.
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-forms-request@w3.org [mailto:public-forms-request@w3.org]
> On Behalf Of Joern Turner
> Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2007 6:55 AM
> To: Nick_Van_den_Bleeken@inventivegroup.com
> Cc: public-forms
> Subject: Re: Erratum that removed the sending of MIP related events on
> model-construct
> 
> ...
> 
> So first question to me is:
> are there people outside using the MIP events for form authoring? Are 
> there really use cases for them? Please excuse the dumb question but i

> myself haven't found a single case in the past where i needed these 
> events as a form author.
> 
> 
>

Received on Wednesday, 5 September 2007 17:15:15 UTC