On Monday, November 19, 2007, 3:50:37 AM, Steve wrote: SB> * This comment: SB> http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/2007/xforms11-lc-doc-20071114.html#ssec124 SB> was rejected by the group and the commenter was unhappy. We can SB> talk about this, and the other "editorial" (so marked) comments SB> that the commenters were not happy about on the call. I also noted one request for a formal objection. http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/2007/xforms11-lc-doc-20071114.html#ssec53 Its not clear that the objection should be sustained, since for one thing its for a *different spec* and also the current specification does not display the problem that was originally complained about, which was already fixed in XForms 1.1 in fact. The commentor is making a process point here, not a technical one. But it should still be discussed and agreed on the call; marking it as user position: 'agree' is odd since the original commentor did not respond. SB> I'm happy to go forward with a transition call. Here are times SB> (US ET) in the coming week that work for me: SB> Mon 19 Nov: noon - 2pm; 4-5pm SB> Wed 21 Nov: 11am - 4pm (I was on vacation that week) SB> (in China the following week) I can do any of the times listed below, except Tues 9am-11am and Fri 10-11am. SB> Mon 3 Dec: noon - 5pm SB> Tue 4 Dec: 9am - 2:30pm SB> Wed 5 Dec: noon - 4pm SB> Fri 7 Dec: any time -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Interaction Domain Leader Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group W3C Graphics Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CGReceived on Monday, 26 November 2007 17:57:52 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:48:27 UTC