John, > Your wording for #139 looks great to me. > If you have no objections, I'd like to include mention of variables too > because someone can put a variable reference into the expression, and > that would be syntactically correct, but we should fail because we > define no variables as in scope... OK by you? Sure. > Regarding the commentary in 7.12, it's an informative note which > suggests that processors may do the behavior. Do you think XPath 2.0 > will cause us to escalate that to a higher requirement level? Not necessarily. It's just that XPath 2.0 actually defines static vs. dynamic errors, which would enable us to easily define how an implementation should perform a static analysis of XPath expressions at loading time, with the main purpose of early error reporting. -Erik -- Orbeon Forms - Web Forms for the Enterprise Done the Right Way http://www.orbeon.com/Received on Thursday, 1 November 2007 01:33:25 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:48:27 UTC