- From: John Boyer <boyerj@ca.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 10:43:45 -0800
- To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Cc: Forms WG <public-forms@w3.org>, public-forms-request@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF7D161E4B.4EA4D218-ON882573AF.0065DC51-882573AF.0066E242@ca.ibm.com>
Hi Chris, Ah, in this case, I think we will proceed with the existing short names, xforms and xforms11, which current point respectively to XForms 1.0 Third Edition Rec and XForms 1.1 CR. In other words, we will proceed with our newsletter using the current names and then issue another letter when there is any change of available names. In the new year, Ian, Steven, you and I can discuss what should be done here. Thanks, John M. Boyer, Ph.D. Senior Technical Staff Member Lotus Forms Architect and Researcher Chair, W3C Forms Working Group Workplace, Portal and Collaboration Software IBM Victoria Software Lab E-Mail: boyerj@ca.ibm.com Blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/JohnBoyer Blog RSS feed: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/rss/JohnBoyer?flavor=rssdw Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org> Sent by: public-forms-request@w3.org 12/12/2007 09:43 AM Please respond to Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org> To John Boyer/CanWest/IBM@IBMCA cc Forms WG <public-forms@w3.org>(new) Subject Re: Short names for XForms technical specs On Wednesday, December 12, 2007, 3:17:33 AM, John wrote: JB> JB> Hi Chris, JB> JB> Could you let me know please if there is any progress on the JB> allocation request for the XForms shortnames (included again below for convenience). Ian Jacobs seems to be saying that shortnames for minor version numbers should not be used. I (and some others) are arguing against that. JB> Tomorrow is the Forms WG telecon, and I need to be able to say JB> what's happening here as it affects our ability to complete an action item. JB> JB> Thanks, JB> John M. Boyer, Ph.D. JB> Senior Technical Staff Member JB> Lotus Forms Architect and Researcher JB> Chair, W3C Forms Working Group JB> Workplace, Portal and Collaboration Software JB> IBM Victoria Software Lab JB> E-Mail: boyerj@ca.ibm.com JB> JB> Blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/JohnBoyer JB> Blog RSS feed: JB> http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/rss/JohnBoyer?flavor=rssdw JB> JB> JB> ----- Forwarded by John Boyer/CanWest/IBM on 12/11/2007 06:15 PM ----- JB> John Boyer/CanWest/IBM JB> 12/07/2007 04:22 PM JB> JB> To JB> Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org> JB> cc JB> JB> Subject JB> Re: Short namesLink JB> JB> JB> JB> P.S. Since Steven is out, could you actually do whatever a team JB> contact would do to make these names take the meanings defined? JB> JB> I am guessing that it's just a request to the webmaster, but JB> since that seems slightly different than approving the names, I JB> thought it best to ask since we need the names to go live so that JB> Leigh Klotz can send out the newsletter containing the names. JB> JB> Thanks, JB> John M. Boyer, Ph.D. JB> STSM: Lotus Forms Architect and Researcher JB> Chair, W3C Forms Working Group JB> Workplace, Portal and Collaboration Software JB> IBM Victoria Software Lab JB> E-Mail: boyerj@ca.ibm.com JB> JB> Blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/JohnBoyer JB> JB> JB> JB> JB> John Boyer/CanWest/IBM@IBMCA JB> Sent by: w3c-html-cg-request@w3.org JB> 12/07/2007 03:14 PM JB> JB> To JB> Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org> JB> cc JB> Hypertext CG <w3c-html-cg@w3.org> JB> Subject JB> Short names JB> JB> JB> JB> JB> Hi Chris, JB> JB> In accordance with the HCG call discussion today, would you please approve the following: JB> JB> xforms10 - The latest edition of the XForms 1.0 recommendation (currently the third edition) JB> JB> xforms11 - The latest edition of XForms 1.1, regardless of JB> status (currently candidate recommendation) JB> JB> xforms1 - The latest edition of XForms 1.x, regardless of status JB> (currently XForms 1.1 candidate recommendation) JB> JB> xforms - The latest recommendation (currently XForms 1.0 third edition). JB> JB> I don't know whether there is any script change or file JB> reorganization needed to make these four names happen, but it JB> should be noted that right now the names xforms and xforms11 point JB> to the right things, so only the new names being requested are xforms10 and xforms1. JB> JB> Reasonably early next year, we will need xforms12, xforms20 and JB> xforms2, but right now we don't have FPWDs for those, so there is no need to create those yet. JB> JB> Thanks, JB> John M. Boyer, Ph.D. JB> STSM: Lotus Forms Architect and Researcher JB> Chair, W3C Forms Working Group JB> Workplace, Portal and Collaboration Software JB> IBM Victoria Software Lab JB> E-Mail: boyerj@ca.ibm.com JB> JB> Blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/JohnBoyer JB> JB> -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Interaction Domain Leader Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group W3C Graphics Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
Received on Wednesday, 12 December 2007 18:44:11 UTC