- From: John Boyer <boyerj@ca.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 18:17:33 -0800
- To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Cc: Forms WG (new) <public-forms@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <OF287DB841.CFFEA88E-ON882573AF.000C6251-882573AF.000C980B@ca.ibm.com>
Hi Chris, Could you let me know please if there is any progress on the allocation request for the XForms shortnames (included again below for convenience). Tomorrow is the Forms WG telecon, and I need to be able to say what's happening here as it affects our ability to complete an action item. Thanks, John M. Boyer, Ph.D. Senior Technical Staff Member Lotus Forms Architect and Researcher Chair, W3C Forms Working Group Workplace, Portal and Collaboration Software IBM Victoria Software Lab E-Mail: boyerj@ca.ibm.com Blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/JohnBoyer Blog RSS feed: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/rss/JohnBoyer?flavor=rssdw ----- Forwarded by John Boyer/CanWest/IBM on 12/11/2007 06:15 PM ----- John Boyer/CanWest/IBM 12/07/2007 04:22 PM To Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org> cc Subject Re: Short names P.S. Since Steven is out, could you actually do whatever a team contact would do to make these names take the meanings defined? I am guessing that it's just a request to the webmaster, but since that seems slightly different than approving the names, I thought it best to ask since we need the names to go live so that Leigh Klotz can send out the newsletter containing the names. Thanks, John M. Boyer, Ph.D. STSM: Lotus Forms Architect and Researcher Chair, W3C Forms Working Group Workplace, Portal and Collaboration Software IBM Victoria Software Lab E-Mail: boyerj@ca.ibm.com Blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/JohnBoyer John Boyer/CanWest/IBM@IBMCA Sent by: w3c-html-cg-request@w3.org 12/07/2007 03:14 PM To Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org> cc Hypertext CG <w3c-html-cg@w3.org> Subject Short names Hi Chris, In accordance with the HCG call discussion today, would you please approve the following: xforms10 - The latest edition of the XForms 1.0 recommendation (currently the third edition) xforms11 - The latest edition of XForms 1.1, regardless of status (currently candidate recommendation) xforms1 - The latest edition of XForms 1.x, regardless of status (currently XForms 1.1 candidate recommendation) xforms - The latest recommendation (currently XForms 1.0 third edition). I don't know whether there is any script change or file reorganization needed to make these four names happen, but it should be noted that right now the names xforms and xforms11 point to the right things, so only the new names being requested are xforms10 and xforms1. Reasonably early next year, we will need xforms12, xforms20 and xforms2, but right now we don't have FPWDs for those, so there is no need to create those yet. Thanks, John M. Boyer, Ph.D. STSM: Lotus Forms Architect and Researcher Chair, W3C Forms Working Group Workplace, Portal and Collaboration Software IBM Victoria Software Lab E-Mail: boyerj@ca.ibm.com Blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/JohnBoyer
Received on Wednesday, 12 December 2007 02:17:50 UTC