Re: Where we stand...

On 6 Sep 2012, at 23:04, Chris Wilson wrote:

> 1) I also had someone ask me about a use case that I don't see listed, but it's fairly high level; is there a reason I am naively not understanding why we don't have any provision for background updating?

This is covered in the raw use cases in the London minutes, which should transfer over to Tobie's refined doc.

> 
> 2) I'm ambivalent, as I said at the MTV meeting, but are we going to follow up on this issue here or have a sub-list in the HTML WG?

The idea is we get something that we can present to the HTML WG that is in a more finished form, so right now my view is that the discussion should take place here for the moment.
-- 

------------------------------
This email was sent by a company owned by Pearson plc, registered office at 
80 Strand, London WC2R 0RL.  Registered in England and Wales with company 
number 53723.

Received on Friday, 7 September 2012 15:45:20 UTC