Re: Working Group/Interest Group timeline

On Jan 11, 2014, at 7:47 AM, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> On 11 January 2014 07:39, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On 10 January 2014 23:21, Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org> wrote:
>> 
>>> As noted earlier there is a new Working Group planned that Tantek will be chairing and an Interest Group with Mark Crawford being added as chair.
>>> 
>>> We are doing due dilligence on some IPR in this space, expect charter to go to AC by end of January. I know everyone is waiting, but it's much easier to due this before than after the new groups start.
>> 
>> 
>> -1000
>> 
>> Can any of the actors in this conversation point to 5 star, standards compliant, linked data?
> 
> A slight clarification on this.  What I'd like to see one of two things:
> 
> 1) Linked Data to be mentioned somewhere in the charter (if there was a pointer to review the current version, that would be great)

+1

> 2) At least one member of the WG producing standards compliant linked data

If the ActivityStreams effort goes forward with using JSON-LD as the basis for representing activities, along with an appropriate vocabulary, this would go a long way.

Gregg

>>> If folks want a meeting this month to catch-up on final preparations, shall we do one next week or the week following?
>>> 
>>>    cheers,
>>>     harry
> 

Received on Saturday, 11 January 2014 16:41:23 UTC