- From: Michał 'rysiek' Woźniak <rysiek@fwioo.pl>
- Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 20:26:26 +0200
- To: public-fedsocweb@w3.org
- Message-Id: <201305302026.29763.rysiek@fwioo.pl>
Hi there, I'm #NewHere, to use a popular cliche on federated social networks. I am an active user of Diaspora, Friendica and StatusNet (soon to be converted to pump.io). I am also a stern proponent of free and open federation protocols and networks. For a while now I have seen Friendica as a great project, allowing the different federated social networks (Diaspora and OStatus-compatible) to be able to communicate and for a single, huge federated network. I am however baffled by the different approaches and protocols being used in distributed social network projects. With the introduction of Red, pump.io, tent.io and other projects not exactly compatible with protocols already utilised, I feel we are not heading in the right direction. What I feel we need is a single, extensible, well-defined protocol, or suite of protocols, that we can build a single, compatible, interoperable federated social network upon. Right now we have OStatus, Diaspora's protocol, DFRN (used by Friendica) and the protocols that are used by Red, tent.io and pump.io, that I am not even sure are properly defined anywhere. If we do not get together and devise a single, workable protocol for all such services to use, the Network Effect will always work against us, instead of working for us: http://rys.io/en/88 So my questions are: - is this the right list to start this discussion? - is there any work done in this regard? - if some, where are we on that road? -- Pozdrawiam Michał "rysiek" Woźniak Fundacja Wolnego i Otwartego Oprogramowania
Received on Thursday, 30 May 2013 20:55:50 UTC