- From: Dileepa Jayakody <dileepajayakody@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 19 May 2013 20:30:01 +0530
- To: Andreas Kuckartz <A.Kuckartz@ping.de>
- Cc: "public-fedsocweb@w3.org" <public-fedsocweb@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAOOwNCL6tDhV+uSv9Bh8K3tn-fZ_N+jWdNqOtu4YCFwb4ZaUMw@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Andreas Kuckartz <A.Kuckartz@ping.de>wrote: > Dileepa Jayakody: > > I've got a small suggestion for the above document. Can we also have a > > section for ongoing/related projects and their use cases (eg: Eclipse > > Higgins, OneSocialWeb, Kantara)? > > I think it will be a useful list for developers. > > I am not absolutely against this but hesitate to do that. Selecting > protocols and standards is already difficult and potentially > controversial. Selecting best projects likely would be even more > controversial. I do not tend to avoid controversies but would like to > concentrate on those around protocols, standards and specifications for > the Best Practices document. > > *** > > The OneSocialWeb project is dead since a few years, which is unfortunate > because it was a promising project... > > Eclipse Higgins also seems to be more dead than alive: > http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/higgins-dev/maillist.html > > Sad to see these projects not living up to their potential. I think we need some reference implementations for the discussed protocols and reference projects (samples) for new explorers (like me) of federated social web. I agree with you on the point that selecting best projects can be controversial but I think that will attract more people to this area of study... Maybe selecting/discussing projects and reference implementations of protocols will be a secondary step in improving the document. > Cheers, > Andreas > >
Received on Sunday, 19 May 2013 15:00:32 UTC