- From: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 00:09:04 +0200
- To: Andreas Kuckartz <A.Kuckartz@ping.de>
- Cc: "Darrell Prince`" <prince.darrell@gmail.com>, "Michiel B. de Jong" <anything@michielbdejong.com>, "public-fedsocweb@w3.org" <public-fedsocweb@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAKaEYh+xP3fDeuwYY+Edv27nSXcPKa4OTREXv7u3_oNcesE20Q@mail.gmail.com>
On 12 May 2013 19:37, Andreas Kuckartz <A.Kuckartz@ping.de> wrote: > I have started with an (almost) blank page: > > > http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/federatedsocialweb/wiki/Best_Practices_for_the_Open_Social_Web > Excellent. Perhaps one area that could be described is best practices for user profiles. Roughly speaking 1 Star Have an identifier denoting a Person, such as an IRC nick -- you're on the web. 2. Star Have an identifier that is unique across domains, eg user@host or example.com/user/joe 3. Star Include a URI scheme such as mailto: xmpp: or http: so that discovery can be performed on that identifier. eg you may wish to lookup a persons name, avatar. blog or public key. Ability to reverse search is a plus too, so that people can look up friends via their name for example. 4 Star Have a standard API so that more information can be discovered. e,g, HTTP GET for HTTP, smtp or webfinger for email, xmpp discovery for xmpp. 5 star Return data using web standards such as JSON LD or RDa in HTML. Or something that is interoperable with these standards. Essentially this boils down to having 0 or more entities with key value pairs associated with them, such that both the keys are machine understandable and the values are allowed to be links. > > Cheers, > Andreas > > Andreas Kuckartz: > > Melvin Carvalho: > >> I think Tim, both with his hacker and W3C hats on, is keen on reusing > web > >> standards (particularly linked data) for the social web. > > > > I think that the connection between the Federated Social Web and Linked > > Data is becoming more and more obvious. For that reason one of the > > target groups of the best practices document should be the Linked Open > > Data communities. > > > > BTW: Manu Sporny suggested that we use a term like Open Social Web > > instead of the more technical term Federated Social Web and I agree with > > that suggestion. (But I would not bother trying to rename the Community > > Group.) > > > > Cheers, > > Andreas >
Received on Sunday, 12 May 2013 22:09:38 UTC