- From: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 13:00:12 +0200
- To: "Michiel B. de Jong" <anything@michielbdejong.com>
- Cc: "public-fedsocweb@w3.org" <public-fedsocweb@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 10 May 2013 11:00:44 UTC
On 10 May 2013 12:52, Michiel B. de Jong <anything@michielbdejong.com>wrote: > On 2013-05-10 12:28, Melvin Carvalho wrote: > >> I think in an ideal world wed like to have a best practice document >> >> AND keep the wiki up to date .. the two need not be mutually exclusive >> :) >> > > correct, that's what i said, isn't it? what is your point here Melvin, are > you afraid the existing wiki content will somehow blur <sarcasm>the fresh > thinking of writing the best practice document from scratch</sarcasm>? > Actually you did suggest using the wiki INSTEAD of a best practice document. I'd like to see both. The wiki is not too well maintained in the last couple of years and some things are out of date. By all means some things from the wiki are relevant to a best practice doc. So I think we are currently saying the same thing :) > > all i'm saying is let's use the wiki as a tool, and use what's on there > already as our starting point for this best practice document. if you are > against that then that's fine, but please explain your reasons. is there > any particular part of the current wiki content that you think should not > make it into the best practice guide? then please point to it. > > it's always so appealing to start from a blank slate with something like > this, but it is rarely the wise choice. > >
Received on Friday, 10 May 2013 11:00:44 UTC