- From: Michał 'rysiek' Woźniak <rysiek@fwioo.pl>
- Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2013 15:22:32 +0200
- To: public-fedsocweb@w3.org
- Message-Id: <201306021522.39259.rysiek@fwioo.pl>
Dnia sobota, 1 czerwca 2013 o 16:48:08 Nick Jennings napisał(a): > Thanks for the summary Melvin, that's a good synopsis. I just want to add > that the JSON objects used in Sockethub are actually more loose than to be > based off v1.0 of activity streams. We just decided to model the approach > after the idea of Activity Streams without getting into any details. The > verb list I've been using, for example, has been off the "activity schema" > draft. > http://activitystrea.ms/registry/verbs/ > > So, it's "neither here nor there" in terms of version number, but I plan to > fix this as Sockethub matures, and more strictly follow the schema for > AS2.0. My question about whether it is a "client-ish" or "server-ish" compatibility layer has still not been answered, while being crucial to whether or not SocketHub is at all useful for server-to-server ferderation. I am talking about this e-mail: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-fedsocweb/2013May/0060.html -- Pozdrawiam Michał "rysiek" Woźniak Fundacja Wolnego i Otwartego Oprogramowania
Received on Sunday, 2 June 2013 16:10:46 UTC