- From: Andreas Kuckartz <A.Kuckartz@ping.de>
- Date: 26 Jul 2013 15:55:25 +0200
- To: "Sandro Hawke" <sandro@w3.org>
- Cc: "Kingsley Idehen" <kidehen@openlinksw.com>, "Melvin Carvalho" <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>, "public-fedsocweb@w3.org" <public-fedsocweb@w3.org>
Sandro Hawke: > I've said things a lot like this over the years, and I'm 100% in favor > of decentralizing, but I'm no longer confident it'll reduce government > access to personal data. Yes, going from a handful of service > providers to millions would make the job of obtaining keys harder, but I > don't think it would make it much harder, not technically. It would > make it harder to keep secret, it's true. But now that this stuff isn't > even plausibly deniable any more, the lawmakers basically have to decide > whether to give the NSA the keys to everything or not. If they decide > to, then they can just demand that every Internet connected system have > an NSA-approved back door. Okay, that might be going a bit far, but > I'm sure folks will be pushing for that, and we'll probably settle on a > compromise that multiuser and/or commercial systems get a backdoor. > And then when you let your kids use your phone, does it qualify as a > multiuser system? A decentralised system can be spread over several jurisdictions. That obviously does not help much when the governments in those jurisdictions collaborate closely. I agree that protecting users against surveillance first of all is a political issue, not a technical one. I will not settle on a compromise with the NSA and their collaborators. Cheers, Andreas
Received on Friday, 26 July 2013 13:59:59 UTC