- From: Julian Steinwachs <julian.steinwachs@googlemail.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 19:27:50 +0100
- To: public-fedsocweb@w3.org
- Message-ID: <51193826.3060803@googlemail.com>
Hi, this protocol agnostic approach sounds very interesting. Because you said you did not search the web thoroughly: There is a standard called activitystreams ( http://http://activitystrea.ms/ ) that is designed to describe social interactions (activities) in atom/xml or json. Beyond the discovery and requesting stuff socml could be designed as an encryption wrapper for activitystreams. Or to make it very short socml=activitystreams+PGP ? Greetings Julian Am 11.02.2013 02:03, schrieb Christopher A: > Hello all, > > First, I want to apologize if I have overstepped boundaries with > respect to editing the groups Wiki page. I also want to apologize if > you receive this message twice. For whatever reason, the Listserv was > not showing that it as having been sent. > > I recently posted a proposal for a "Federated Social Network Data > Standard" on the groups Wiki. I admit, that I have not searched the > web thoroughly with respect to other initiatives like this; however, > given the superficial research I have done, I have come to the > conclusion that there are no open dialogs currently on this topic. > > Over the next couple of days I will begin posting proposed > technical specifications for the standard. I would like for everyone > to contribute feedback and make suggestions/modifications. > > The solution I am proposing is simple: we need to standardize social > media content such that independent developers can create their own > services that can share and aggregate data under a common standard. > Much like the RSS format, this data standard should be open and free, > not encumbered by patents, and be easy to implement while offering > these features: > > * Complete end-to-end privacy control, with the use > of asymmetric encryption. > * A method for authenticating that people "are who they say they are." > * True protocol agnosticism, this data standard should be > freely interchangeable with the number of web technologies that exist. > * Content portability, meaning the user can choose to use a number > of providers to store pictures, comments, events, messages, etc. > while still having their information available to those with the > proper access. > > Anyway, here is the current link to the proposal: > http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/federatedsocialweb/wiki/SOCML_Proposal > > The SOCML standard overiew: > http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/federatedsocialweb/wiki/SOCML_Standard > > And the Technical Specifications (in progress!): > http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/federatedsocialweb/wiki/SOCML_Technical > > Please feel free to critique or reprimand. > > I hope everyone is doing well, and I look forward to working with > everyone. > > Chris > > > On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Christopher A <chris.socml@gmail.com > <mailto:chris.socml@gmail.com>> wrote: > > Hello all, > > First, I want to apologize if I have overstepped boundaries with > respect to editing the groups Wiki page. > > I recently posted a proposal for a "Federated Social Network Data > Standard" on the groups Wiki. I admit, that I have not searched > the web thoroughly with respect to other initiatives like this; > however, given the superficial research I have done, I have come > to the conclusion that currently there are no open dialogs around > this topic. > > Over the next couple of days I will begin posting proposed > technical specifications for the standard. I would like for > everyone to contribute feedback and make suggestions/modifications. > > The solution I am proposing is simple: we need to standardize > social media content such that independent developers can create > their own services that can share and aggregate data under a > common standard. This standard, should be open and free, not > encumbered by patents, and be easy to implement while offering > these features: > > * > > > * Complete end-to-end privacy control, with use > of asymmetric encryption. > * A method for authenticating that people are who they say they are. > * True data agnosticism, meaning the end user can choose to use > a number of providers to store pictures, comments, events, > messages, etc. while still having their information available > to those with the proper access. > * The ability to freely host or move their information to > different service providers. > > Anyway, here is the current link to the proposal: > http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/federatedsocialweb/wiki/SOCML_Proposal > > The SOCML standard overiew: > http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/federatedsocialweb/wiki/SOCML_Standard > > And the Technical Specifications (in progress!): > http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/federatedsocialweb/wiki/SOCML_Technical > > Please feel free to critique or reprimand. > > I hope everyone is doing well, and I look forward to working with > everyone. > > Chris > >
Received on Monday, 11 February 2013 21:41:11 UTC