- From: Michiel de Jong <michiel@unhosted.org>
- Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 15:44:25 +0200
- To: Goix Laurent Walter <laurentwalter.goix@telecomitalia.it>, public-fedsocweb@w3.org, Evan Prodromou <evan@status.net>, maxwell@joindiaspora.com, pfefferle@gmail.com
- Cc: "openid-specs-ab@lists.openid.net" <openid-specs-ab@lists.openid.net>, pelle@kodfabrik.se
Oops, that list address changed to public-fedsocweb@w3.org since then, sorry. On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Michiel de Jong <michiel@unhosted.org> wrote: > Probably you already heard through other lists, bu the thing we > discussed here in October: > > On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Goix Laurent Walter > <laurentwalter.goix@telecomitalia.it> wrote: >> I would really like to discuss it with people interested in this Webfinger vs. SWD issue! >> Maybe we could try to organize a teleconf to clarify few things about it? > > is now happening! Webfinger and swd are now (hopefully) being merged > together into one universally compatible standard. If there are any > features of webfinger you would like to keep in there after the merge, > then now is the time to speak up. The discussion is open and public > and is taking place here: > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/current/msg05074.html > > I personally have no strong opinion about any of the features in which > they differ, as long as the core functionality that both have in > common is preserved. But some of you might, and this is very relevant > for the federated social web, and we have a significant investment in > existing install base, so as Pelle already said on the OStatus list, i > agree it's worth making your voice heard. Also to signal to others > that the (federated) social web is something we on these mailing lists > care about. > > > My 2ct, > Michiel
Received on Thursday, 19 April 2012 13:45:00 UTC