Consensus [Re: Calls for Consensus following TPAC]

Hearing no objections online or on Tuesday's CG/WG call, the chairs 
recognize a consensus to proceed as indicated with proposal advancement 
and streamlining of procedure.

Thanks!
--Wendy


On 10/1/24 17:13, Wendy Seltzer wrote:
> Hi FedID WG members,
> 
> Thanks for your participation in TPAC meetings for the FedID CG and WG. 
> We had good discussions despite the logistical challenges of a major 
> power outage and construction noise! Minutes are now posted to GitHub:
> 
> <https://github.com/fedidcg/meetings/blob/main/2024/2024-09-23-TPAC-notes.md> Day 1
> 
> <https://github.com/fedidcg/meetings/blob/main/2024/2024-09-24-TPAC-notes.md> Day 2
> 
> Please let us know (ideally via pull requests) of any additions or 
> corrections.
> 
> 
> On day 1, we discussed the CG-WG process and several feature demos. On 
> day 2 (compressed), we reviewed proposals in Stage 1 to assess their 
> status and progress. Several proposals had consensus in the room to 
> advance to Stage 2. This means their proposers will now work on pull 
> requests to develop spec text.
> 
> 
> Chairs committed to sending these items to the list to confirm the 
> in-room consensus to move to Stage 2:
> 
> * Active Mode (Issue 442)
> * Continuation API (Issue 555)
> * Account Labels API (Issue 553)
> * Multiple configURLs API (Issue 552)
> * Multi-IdP API (Issue 319):
> * SAA Autogrant  (Issue 467)
> 
> (see links and issue descriptions from 
> <https://github.com/w3c-fedid/FedCM/wiki/Status-of-FPWD%E2%80%90identified-Issues> )
> 
> This is a consensus call. If you object to the advancement of any of the 
> above proposals to Stage 2 in the CG-WG process, please let the chairs 
> know. Otherwise, their advancement will be confirmed in one week.
> 
> 
> In addition,
> 
> * Lightweight FedCM is preparing to move to Stage 2
> 
> * Login Status held an extended discussion that continued beyond the end 
> of the working session. Johann wrote up a GitHub issue to see if there 
> are agreed next steps.
>   <https://github.com/w3c-fedid/login-status/issues/8> If you’re 
> involved or interested, please weigh in on that issue.
> 
> 
> Procedural call for consensus: At the TPAC meeting, we made only 
> provisional decisions and followed with this call for consensus. We 
> think it would be productive for the group to allow chairs and editors 
> to make real-time consensus calls on pull requests and proposals.
> Accordingly, we’re asking for WG consensus that group decisions on PR 
> merges and proposal advancement may be made without a follow-up call to 
> the list. (Advancement in the W3C Process to Candidate Recommendation 
> would still require asynchronous response time as per our charter.) 
> Decisions must always be documented and open to the presentation of new 
> information.
> 
> Please let us know within a week whether you have any objection to this 
> decision process on PRs and proposal advancement.
> 
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> –Wendy for the FedID WG chairs

-- 
Wendy Seltzer -- wendy@seltzer.org +1 617.863.0613
https://wendy.seltzer.org/
Principal Identity Architect, Tucows

Received on Thursday, 10 October 2024 15:13:37 UTC