- From: Florent Georges <fgeorges@fgeorges.org>
- Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 13:23:49 +0100
- To: Adam Retter <adam@exist-db.org>
- Cc: Christian Grün <christian.gruen@gmail.com>, EXPath <public-expath@w3.org>
Thank you Adam! Looking at the changes in the schema, there shouldn't have got any impact on the existing test suites. The changes to the suites you committed re-order some elements, which have not been changed in the schema. It seems then that some test suite were not valid according the schema (even before update). I am going to merge the commits. Can please: 1) implementers check that their implementations still pass the test suites after the changes 2) editors double-check the changes in the pull request <https://github.com/expath/expath-cg/pull/65> and validate they look OK Regards, -- Florent Georges http://fgeorges.org/ http://h2oconsulting.be/ On 18 February 2015 at 13:42, Adam Retter wrote: > Well it turns out that I cannot find a suitable path for referencing a > downloadable version outside of CVS, so I have just replaced it with > the latest. > > My pull-request - https://github.com/expath/expath-cg/pull/65 > > On 18 February 2015 at 13:09, Christian Grün <christian.gruen@gmail.com> wrote: >>> The test catalogues do not validate against the official QT3 schema, >>> due to a few things. Should I try and fix and send in a pull-request. >>> Also I wonder if we really should duplicate that Schema file, to avoid >>> such things happening again in future, why don't we just reference it? >> >> I see.. Yes, it sounds reasonable to simply reference the schema. >> Michael is the probably one to answer that (our own test suite doesn't >> use any schema).. > > > > -- > Adam Retter > > eXist Developer > { United Kingdom } > adam@exist-db.org > irc://irc.freenode.net/existdb >
Received on Friday, 20 February 2015 12:24:38 UTC