- From: Florent Georges <fgeorges@fgeorges.org>
- Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 13:23:49 +0100
- To: Adam Retter <adam@exist-db.org>
- Cc: Christian Grün <christian.gruen@gmail.com>, EXPath <public-expath@w3.org>
Thank you Adam!
Looking at the changes in the schema, there shouldn't have got any
impact on the existing test suites. The changes to the suites you
committed re-order some elements, which have not been changed in the
schema. It seems then that some test suite were not valid according
the schema (even before update).
I am going to merge the commits. Can please:
1) implementers check that their implementations still pass the test
suites after the changes
2) editors double-check the changes in the pull request
<https://github.com/expath/expath-cg/pull/65> and validate they look
OK
Regards,
--
Florent Georges
http://fgeorges.org/
http://h2oconsulting.be/
On 18 February 2015 at 13:42, Adam Retter wrote:
> Well it turns out that I cannot find a suitable path for referencing a
> downloadable version outside of CVS, so I have just replaced it with
> the latest.
>
> My pull-request - https://github.com/expath/expath-cg/pull/65
>
> On 18 February 2015 at 13:09, Christian Grün <christian.gruen@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> The test catalogues do not validate against the official QT3 schema,
>>> due to a few things. Should I try and fix and send in a pull-request.
>>> Also I wonder if we really should duplicate that Schema file, to avoid
>>> such things happening again in future, why don't we just reference it?
>>
>> I see.. Yes, it sounds reasonable to simply reference the schema.
>> Michael is the probably one to answer that (our own test suite doesn't
>> use any schema)..
>
>
>
> --
> Adam Retter
>
> eXist Developer
> { United Kingdom }
> adam@exist-db.org
> irc://irc.freenode.net/existdb
>
Received on Friday, 20 February 2015 12:24:38 UTC