W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-expath@w3.org > December 2015

Re: ExPath Facet proposal

From: Adam Retter <adam@exist-db.org>
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2015 08:33:51 +0000
Message-ID: <CAJKLP9ZdavjzMqkPaKJzBM7x0mmQydSPkbBqrW54E1PihpUYkw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Zhou, Zed" <Zed.Zhou@emc.com>
Cc: "public-expath@w3.org" <public-expath@w3.org>
Heh, no worries! I just wondered if it was still on the cards. All the
best and Happy New Year.

On 31 December 2015 at 02:25, Zhou, Zed <Zed.Zhou@emc.com> wrote:
> Hi Adam,
>
> Thanks for pointing this out.  You are correct, I will update the spec in git and send a pull request.
>
> Yes you've mentioned this point in the initial correspondence.  I will be more careful in the future.
>
> Zed
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Adam Retter [mailto:adam@exist-db.org]
> Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2015 6:04 AM
> To: Zhou, Zed
> Cc: public-expath@w3.org
> Subject: Re: ExPath Facet proposal
>
> Hi Zhou,
>
> It seems to me that if we ignore Issue 1 in the Appendix, then there is nothing in the spec that is specific to XQuery, rather it could sit at the XPath level. In fact that is rather why I previously suggested you submit it to EXPath rather than EXQuery. Do you plan to update the spec to reflect that, i.e. replace "designed to be compatible with XQuery 3.0" with "designed to be compatible with XPath 3.0"? ...or perhaps I have missed something?
>
> On 28 December 2015 at 02:45, Zhou, Zed <Zed.Zhou@emc.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>>
>> A new facet proposal working draft has been posted at:
>>
>>
>>
>> http://expath.org/spec/facet
>>
>> http://expath.org/spec/facet/20151225
>>
>>
>>
>> With the corresponding sources:
>>
>>
>>
>> http://expath.org/spec/facet.xml
>>
>> http://expath.org/spec/facet/20151225.xml
>>
>>
>>
>> This proposal defines a standardized approach to support the Faceted
>> search in XQuery. It has been designed to be compatible with XQuery
>> 3.0, and is intended to be used in conjunction with XQuery and XPath Full Text 3.0.
>>
>>
>>
>> Your review and feedback are highly desired and welcomed, especially
>> in regards to the open issues listed in the Appendix about facet
>> implementation and optimization.
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Zed Zhou
>>
>> EMC
>
>
>
> --
> Adam Retter
>
> eXist Developer
> { United Kingdom }
> adam@exist-db.org
> irc://irc.freenode.net/existdb



-- 
Adam Retter

eXist Developer
{ United Kingdom }
adam@exist-db.org
irc://irc.freenode.net/existdb
Received on Thursday, 31 December 2015 08:34:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:47:39 UTC