W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-expath@w3.org > December 2015

Re: ExPath Facet proposal

From: Adam Retter <adam@exist-db.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2015 22:03:45 +0000
Message-ID: <CAJKLP9bVFG1zXyBVvwHButUNb8Vr4KmOjWVQ0khLbW-5Xfbt5w@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Zhou, Zed" <Zed.Zhou@emc.com>
Cc: "public-expath@w3.org" <public-expath@w3.org>
Hi Zhou,

It seems to me that if we ignore Issue 1 in the Appendix, then there
is nothing in the spec that is specific to XQuery, rather it could sit
at the XPath level. In fact that is rather why I previously suggested
you submit it to EXPath rather than EXQuery. Do you plan to update the
spec to reflect that, i.e. replace "designed to be compatible with
XQuery 3.0" with "designed to be compatible with XPath 3.0"? ...or
perhaps I have missed something?

On 28 December 2015 at 02:45, Zhou, Zed <Zed.Zhou@emc.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> A new facet proposal working draft has been posted at:
>
>
>
> http://expath.org/spec/facet
>
> http://expath.org/spec/facet/20151225
>
>
>
> With the corresponding sources:
>
>
>
> http://expath.org/spec/facet.xml
>
> http://expath.org/spec/facet/20151225.xml
>
>
>
> This proposal defines a standardized approach to support the Faceted search
> in XQuery. It has been designed to be compatible with XQuery 3.0, and is
> intended to be used in conjunction with XQuery and XPath Full Text 3.0.
>
>
>
> Your review and feedback are highly desired and welcomed, especially in
> regards to the open issues listed in the Appendix about facet implementation
> and optimization.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Zed Zhou
>
> EMC



-- 
Adam Retter

eXist Developer
{ United Kingdom }
adam@exist-db.org
irc://irc.freenode.net/existdb
Received on Wednesday, 30 December 2015 22:04:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:47:39 UTC