Re: Reminder: Archive Module

> I've added a generalization of the example of 3.3 into a function that can
> either be provided as an XSLT package (which assumes the use of EXPathFile),
> or provided as a built-in function with the same name, for which an entry
> appears in the function catalog:

This sounds like a good compromise. I also like the name of the
function arch:extract-to-files(). To avoid redundance in the reverse
function arch:archive-from-files(), we could simplify it to
arch:to-files() and arch:from-files().

> Since entries are named with the solidus as the separator, then any entry
> whose name ends with '/' could be taken to be a directory, and any (usually
> empty) content, either in the parallel content argument or in the
> appropriate 'content' map entry is ignored, and an empty directory added to
> the archive?

True, ignoring the entry is probably sufficient. Thanks for your proposal.

Christian

Received on Friday, 15 November 2013 16:03:54 UTC