- From: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2013 21:41:42 +0100
- To: Christian Grün <christian.gruen@gmail.com>
- Cc: Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>, Florent Georges <fgeorges@fgeorges.org>, EXPath CG <public-expath@w3.org>
On 3 Jul 2013, at 21:23, Christian Grün wrote: >> I thought that we can formally use untypedAtomic in signature, but raise >> dynamic error when passed parameter is not hexBinary or base64Binary >> value. > > This would also be my favorite approach (as I believe I have mentioned > in the thread from March). > I'm sure you mean xs:anyAtomicType rather than xs:untypedAtomic. I think this is probably the best we'll manage. Michael Kay Saxonica
Received on Wednesday, 3 July 2013 20:42:07 UTC