Re: EXPath binary module - comments - negative zero

On 05/08/2013 12:03, Florent Georges wrote:
> On 5 August 2013 09:56, John Lumley wrote:
>
>> [...] XMLSchema 1.1 which is a more recent version than XML
>> Schema 2 - but of course the devil is in the detailed wording.
>> XML Schema Part 2 is older than XML Schema 1.1 Part 2.
>    Sorry, this is not the main subject, but I have a hard time
> making sense of the above paragraph.  XML Schema 2?
>
I'd misread 'XML Schema Part 2' as 'XML Schema 2', which of course would 
have to be more recent than 'XML Schema 1.1', wouldn't it?

(I knew schemas were a bad idea, and just going to cause confusion and 
depression ;-)...)
-- 
*John Lumley* MA PhD CEng FIEE
john@saxonica.com <mailto:john@saxonica.com>
on behalf of Saxonica Ltd