- From: Florent Georges <fgeorges@fgeorges.org>
- Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2013 14:47:13 +0100
- To: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>
- Cc: EXPath CG <public-expath@w3.org>
On 3 August 2013 14:30, Michael Kay wrote: > I would say just maintain the test suite in GitHub. A link > from the spec is a good idea. I let Jirka and John have the last word on this, and update the spec, but I think this is indeed a good enough and the easiest solution. Probably a new sub-section below "Introduction", with a link and a few words about the suite is the best option. > If we're worrying about improving processes, I think the > priority is to define a way of deciding and documenting that a > spec has achieved a particular level of stability and > consensus. Interesting subject. From my point of view, a consensus had to be "felt"; either it is (kind of) obvious, or it is not achieved. Do you think there is any possible improvement in this area? Regards, -- Florent Georges http://fgeorges.org/ http://h2oconsulting.be/
Received on Saturday, 3 August 2013 13:48:01 UTC