AW: Comments on Canonical EXI

All,



I implemented the final fixes as discussed in telecon 02/12/2018

* Section 1.3: change "relying party" to "receiving party"



* Section 2.1: change "This schema is designed to be transmitted very efficiently using EXI and is designed to reuse the EXI options" to

 "This schema is designed for efficient transmission by utilizing EXI options."

* Section 4.2.2: change "MUST NOT" in note to "does not" and change order of sentences to

"The verification is solely based on EXI grammars and EXI datatypes. A Canonical EXI processor does not account for XML schema validity (similar to an EXI processor) in order to maintain high-performance efficiency. "



 * Appendix D3: lower-case the word "SHALL" to "shall"



 * Appendix E.2.1 Algorithm="http://www.w3.org/2016/exi-c14n" becomes "http://www.w3.org/TR/exi-c14n"

A diff can be found here [1].



Thanks,



-- Daniel



[1] https://services.w3.org/htmldiff?doc1=http://www.w3.org/TR/exi-c14n/&doc2=https://www.w3.org/XML/EXI/docs/canonical/canonical-exi.html





________________________________

Von: Takuki Kamiya [takuki.kamiya@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Montag, 12. Februar 2018 10:10
An: public-exi@w3.org
Betreff: Comments on Canonical EXI

Hi,

In Canonical EXI draft, in section 1.3 Applications, it uses a term "relying party".
I am not very familiar with this term. Is it appropriate to use the term in this context?

In section 2.1 Canonical EXI Options, it says:
The schema is designed to be transmitted very efficiently....

Isn't it Canonical EXI Options document that is transmitted efficiently?

Thank you,

Takuki Kamiya
Fujitsu Laboratories of America