- From: Xueyuan <xueyuan@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 18:41:23 +0800
- To: public-exi@w3.org
- Message-ID: <3ce20e6e-3003-67f0-a4a0-4a317bcc2985@w3.org>
Dear members of the EXI Working Group, I'm relaying the announcement to the group's primarily public mailing list, to notify the group of its charter extension. Best regards, Xueyuan -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Canonical EXI is a W3C Proposed Recommendation (Call for Review); Charter Extended Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 18:36:07 +0800 From: Xueyuan <xueyuan@w3.org> To: w3c-ac-members@w3.org CC: chairs@w3.org Dear Advisory Committee Representative, Chairs, W3C is pleased to announce the advancement of Canonical EXI to Proposed Recommendation: https://www.w3.org/TR/2018/PR-exi-c14n-20180426/ [...] The Efficient eXtended Interchange (EXI) Working Group [1] charter [2] is extended until the end of May 2018, so that the Recommendation track can be completed for this specification. Information on how to participate in this group is available [3]. The group is currently chaired by Takuki Kamiya (Fujitsu). If you should have any questions or need further information, please contact Carine Bournez <carine@w3.org> or Liam Quin <liam@w3.org>, EXI WG Staff Contacts. [...] The extension follows section 5.2.5 of the W3C Process Document: https://www.w3.org/2018/Process-20180201/#charter-extension Thank you, For Tim Berners-Lee, W3C Director, Philippe Le Hégaret, Project Management Lead, Carine Bournez and Liam Quin, Staff Contacts, Xueyuan Jia, W3C Marketing & Communications [1] https://www.w3.org/XML/EXI/ [2] https://www.w3.org/XML/2015/05/exi-charter.html [3] https://www.w3.org/2004/01/pp-impl/38502/join ============================================== Quoting from Canonical EXI W3C Proposed Recommendation 26 April 2018 This version: https://www.w3.org/TR/2018/PR-exi-c14n-20180426/ Latest version: https://www.w3.org/TR/exi-c14n/ Abstract: Any EXI document is part of a set of EXI documents that are logically equivalent within an application context, but which vary in physical representation based on differences permitted by the [EXI Format 1.0]. This specification describes a relatively simple method for generating a physical representation, the canonical form, of an EXI document that accounts for the permissible differences. An example of the applications targeted by this specification is one that needs to guarantee non-repudiation using XML Signature yet allows certain flexibility for intermediaries to reconstitute the documents before they reach final destination without breaking the signatures. Note that two documents may have differing canonical forms yet still be equivalent in a given context based on more elaborate application-specific equivalence rules which is out of scope of this specification. Status of this Document: This section describes the status of this document at the time of its publication. Other documents may supersede this document. A list of current W3C publications and the latest revision of this technical report can be found in the W3C technical reports index at https://www.w3.org/TR/. This is the Proposed Recommendation of the Canonical EXI specification and it has been produced by the EXI Working Group. This document is intended to become a W3C Recommendation. A diff-marked version against the previous version of this document is available. Comments about this document are welcome. Please send them to the public-exi-comments@w3.org mailing list (Archives). Advisory Committee Representatives should consult their WBS questionnaires. The interoperability testing has been performed using test cases developed in the EXI testsuite. An implementation report has been produced. Publication as a Proposed Recommendation does not imply endorsement by the W3C Membership. This is a draft document and may be updated, replaced or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to cite this document as other than work in progress. This document was produced by a group operating under the W3C Patent Policy. W3C maintains a public list of any patent disclosures made in connection with the deliverables of the group; that page also includes instructions for disclosing a patent. An individual who has actual knowledge of a patent which the individual believes contains Essential Claim(s) must disclose the information in accordance with section 6 of the W3C Patent Policy. This document is governed by the 1 February 2018 W3C Process Document. ==============================================
Received on Thursday, 26 April 2018 10:41:29 UTC