On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 8:50 PM, Takuki Kamiya <tkamiya@us.fujitsu.com> wrote: In the case of “decimal”, probably we have not seen a good use case to use > it in EXI4JSON. > > I tend to agree that we drop “decimal”. > If you leave it out, it is not possible to do 1:1 conversion between arbitrary JSON and EXI4JSON. For example, a number greater than 1e308 can only be represented as decimal, or a number that requires more than 17 digits of precision. -- John Cowan http://vrici.lojban.org/~cowan cowan@ccil.org LEAR: Dost thou call me fool, boy? FOOL: All thy other titles thou hast given away: That thou wast born with.
Received on Tuesday, 28 March 2017 01:56:09 UTC