W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-exi@w3.org > April 2016

RE: Canonical EXI - CR Review

From: Takuki Kamiya <tkamiya@us.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 17:18:51 -0700
To: "Peintner, Daniel (ext)" <daniel.peintner.ext@siemens.com>, "public-exi@w3.org" <public-exi@w3.org>
Message-ID: <23204FACB677D84EBD57175AB7B5A71C03B436A06250@FMSAMAIL.fmsa.local>
Hi Daniel,

In the final review before requesting CR transition, I have the following
comments.

1. In section 3, it says:

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A canonical EXI Options document MUST respect the following constraints.

1.The EXI Options elements (i.e. byte, pre-compress, selfContained, valueMaxLength, valuePartitionCapacity, dtd, prefixes, lexicalValues, comments, pis, blockSize, compression, fragment, schemaId, strict) that match the default value (e.g., <blockSize>1000000</blockSize>) MUST be omitted (see EXI specification for default values).
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I am not exactly sure what this paragraph means. For instance, byte element
does not per se have a default value. In this sense, <byte/> element cannot 
be omitted. Moreover, it is self-evident that <byte/> cannot be omitted because 
omission makes the setting fallback to bitPacked.

2. In section 4.3.3 Whitespace Handling, it says:

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Not in all situations it is possible to respect whitespace handling rules. For example when the grammar in effect is a schema-informed strict-grammar and xml:space is "preserve". The value " 123 " typed as xsd:int cannot preserve the heading and trailing whitespace when typed datatype representation is used.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Is this specific to strict mode?

If we allow the use of typed CH production, the above note should apply to
non-strict case.

3. I think we should have Acknowledgements section in the Appendix
  listing all names of WG members, as well as a few ex-members who
  contributed to the production of this document.

Thank you,

Takuki Kamiya
Fujitsu Laboratories of America


-----Original Message-----
From: Peintner, Daniel (ext) [mailto:daniel.peintner.ext@siemens.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2016 3:25 AM
To: public-exi@w3.org
Subject: Canonical EXI - CR Review

All,

With the latest updates I believe we resolved all issues w.r.t. to Canonical EXI.

Before moving to Candidate Recommendation (CR) I ask everyone to do a review of the document [1].

A diff compared to the last call document can be found here [2].

Thanks,

-- Daniel

[1] https://www.w3.org/XML/EXI/docs/canonical/canonical-exi.html
[2] http://services.w3.org/htmldiff?doc1=http://www.w3.org/TR/exi-c14n/&doc2=https://www.w3.org/XML/EXI/docs/canonical/canonical-exi.html ~
Received on Friday, 1 April 2016 00:19:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:47:20 UTC