- From: Peintner, Daniel <daniel.peintner.ext@siemens.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 13:40:33 +0000
- To: Takuki Kamiya <tkamiya@us.fujitsu.com>, "public-exi-comments@w3.org" <public-exi-comments@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 7 March 2017 13:41:21 UTC
Hi Taki, all, Thanks for your input. I see your points and propose to merge the two sections and recommend adding a note with an example. I went ahead and implemented my proposal. Please have a look at [1]. Thanks, -- Daniel [1] https://www.w3.org/XML/EXI/docs/canonical/canonical-exi.html#excludeExtraneousEvents ________________________________ Von: Takuki Kamiya [tkamiya@us.fujitsu.com] Gesendet: Dienstag, 31. Januar 2017 08:48 An: public-exi-comments@w3.org Betreff: Canonical EXI - 4.3.1 and 4.3.2 Hi, Section 4.3.1 says: "Canonical EXI MUST exclude extraneous CH ("") events unless they are required by the EXI grammar (see 4.3.2 Empty element content)." However, section 4.3.2 does not seem to describe such a situation very well. All what 4.3.2 describes seems to be again about removing extraneous CH (""). Thank you, Takuki Kamiya Fujitsu Laboratories of America
Received on Tuesday, 7 March 2017 13:41:21 UTC