W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-exi-comments@w3.org > February 2017

Canonical EXI section 4.2.2

From: Takuki Kamiya <tkamiya@us.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 00:26:25 -0800
To: "public-exi-comments@w3.org" <public-exi-comments@w3.org>
Message-ID: <23204FACB677D84EBD57175AB7B5A71C042F8C7B9045@FMSAMAIL.fmsa.local>

Excerpted below is a note in section 4.2.2 [1].

"A Canonical EXI processor MUST NOT account for XML schema validity 
 (similar to an EXI processor) in order to maintain high-performance efficiency."

The statement uses "MUST NOT", therefore it should not be placed in a note.

Furthermore, I think canonical EXI processor can optionally choose to implement 
a feature to account for XML schema validity. In that case, "MUST NOT" may be
a bit too strong an expression.

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2016/CR-exi-c14n-20161103/#exiEventMatching

Thank you,

Takuki Kamiya
Fujitsu Laboratories of America
Received on Tuesday, 28 February 2017 08:27:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 28 February 2017 08:27:41 UTC