- From: Daniel Peintner <daniel.peintner@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 18:57:44 +0200
- To: "Yuri Delendik" <yury_exi@yahoo.com>, public-exi-comments@w3.org, "Efficient XML Interchange WG" <member-exi-wg@w3.org>
Hi Yuri, Thank you very much for your feedback. > Complex Ur-type Grammar (8.5.4.1.3.3) and Schema-informed Element Fragment Grammar > (Section 8.5.3) section define element grammars, but do not define grammars for corresponding > TypeEmpty_i. Section 8.5.4.4 Undeclared Element uses the empty grammars in explanation > how the xsi:nil form is evaluated. > > It is unclear how the xsl:nil form is evaluated when TypeEmpty_i grammar is not present. You are right. That's an omission in the specification which will be fixed with the next update. e.g. TypeEmpty for ur-Type is going to look like Ur-Type_0 : AT(*) Ur-Type_0 EE Regards, -- Daniel
Received on Thursday, 2 October 2008 16:59:43 UTC