- From: John Schneider <john.schneider@agiledelta.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 13:31:03 -0800
- To: "'ISHIZAKI Tooru'" <ishizaki.tooru@canon.co.jp>, <public-exi-comments@w3.org>
- Cc: <youenn.fablet@crf.canon.fr>, <fujisawa.jun@canon.co.jp>
Dear Tooru, Thank you for your feedback on the EXI specification. This is a very good question. The advantage of the local-element-ns flag is improved compactness for representing element QNames when Preserve.prefixes is true. Without the local-element-ns flag, the prefix encoding for each element QName would have to account for the possibility that the prefix is declared by an NS event that follows the associated SE event (i.e., a prefix that has not yet been encountered in the stream). In the common case, where there is only one prefix declared for each namespace, the prefix encoding would increase from zero bits per element to one bit per element. If there were two prefixes declared for each namespace, the prefix encoding would increase from one bit per element to two bits per element. Since there can be a lot of SE events in a document, this can have a significant impact on compactness. I hope this helps to answer your question. Thanks again, John Schneider AgileDelta, Inc. http://www.agiledelta.com > -----Original Message----- > From: public-exi-comments-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-exi-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of > ISHIZAKI Tooru > Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2008 2:33 AM > To: public-exi-comments@w3.org > Cc: youenn.fablet@crf.canon.fr; fujisawa.jun@canon.co.jp > Subject: Feedback of EXI specification 2 > > > Dear EXI members, > > I have a feedback of EXI specification. > In chapter 4, what's the advantage of local-element-ns flag? > > Best Regrads, > Tooru Ishizaki. > > -- > TOORU Ishizaki <ishizaki.tooru@canon.co.jp> > > >
Received on Wednesday, 26 November 2008 21:42:56 UTC