- From: Jeremie Patonnier <jeremie.patonnier@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2011 22:02:53 +0200
- To: karld@opera.com, "'public-evangelist@w3.org' w3. org" <public-evangelist@w3.org>
- Cc: Chris Mills <cmills@opera.com>
- Message-ID: <CAEi838=6degrvhvczwaCY5RUnz0t8NRGi+C1z9Vy=Eh42i2KPw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi, I make a new post thread to talk about those legal stuffs. To resume my position : I think CC BY-BC-SA<http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/>are a bad license for a wiki. The attribution constrain is to hard for such a content, especially educational content. USA and UK have legal agreement (such as « Fair use ») to not have to worried about it. But France and some other countries do not have such an agreement. To be perfectly clear, I don't care. The spirit behind that content is very clear : « Use it to spread the world about Web standards ». It's fine with me... but we all know that the Internet is full of jerk. In the current legal state, if a single moron make a change on the wiki content under CC, he can lock the content down. Now, to answer Karl, I suggest two things here : 1. If possible, turn any CC content into a CC0 "Public Domain" content. FWIW I think it's the most appropriate license term for such a content. 2. If it's not possible, add some precision about what "attribution" means on the W3C wiki. It's the way Wikipedia deal with this concern and even if I'm not convince it's enough, at least, it prevent from any stupid legal abuse. Now to conclude, as I said, this will change nothing to me, but I think it's a concern for the W3C. IMHO If this wiki become more and more publicly known, this concern will grow fast. Cheers Jérémie ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Karl Dubost <karld@opera.com> Date: 2011/7/31 Subject: Re: WSC update - introductory article edited. To: Jeremie Patonnier <jeremie.patonnier@gmail.com> Cc: Chris Mills <cmills@opera.com>, "'public-evangelist@w3.org' w3. org" < public-evangelist@w3.org> Le 30 juil. 2011 à 18:20, Jeremie Patonnier a écrit : > I'm pretty sure we will never have to be worry about that so maybe we should not start worry about it. ;) > but I think there is some legal concern here anyway. What would you propose for a license that would address those concerns. -- Karl Dubost - http://dev.opera.com/ Developer Relations & Tools, Opera Software -- Jeremie ............................. Web : http://jeremie.patonnier.net Twitter : @JeremiePat <http://twitter.com/JeremiePat>
Received on Sunday, 31 July 2011 20:03:48 UTC