- From: Danilo Strauss Neto <danilosneto@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2011 13:14:53 -0300
- To: Chris Mills <cmills@opera.com>
- Cc: "'public-evangelist@w3.org' w3. org" <public-evangelist@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CA+oFvkhCpTyYpCcCYUNu8umMK1pBO3hg5YkFXr-Tg+AhaMgMaw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Chris, I think it should be separated into another article there. Read it at once, but there is about half of the actual article speaking for just one element. Cheers, ---------------------------------------- Danilo Strauss Neto Web Project Manager / Graphic Designer 0 55 (31) 8872-6268 - Belo Horizonte, MG danilosneto@gmail.com http://dbrainstorms.blogspot.com/ On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 12:56, Chris Mills <cmills@opera.com> wrote: > UPDATE - 4th August 2011: I've updated > http://www.w3.org/wiki/The_HTML_head_element to clean up language, add new > HTML5 features, and add in a new section about doctypes, to replace Choosing > the right doctype for your HTML documents ( > http://www.w3.org/wiki/Choosing_the_right_doctype_for_your_HTML_documents). > The original article was a bit long winded, and needed a lot of updates to > account for new thinking about doctypes, HTML5 doctype, etc. > > this is ready for proofing/translation now. > > QUESTION - should this big new doctype section be put into a new article? > Does it make the article a bit too long? > > > > -- > > Chris Mills > Open standards evangelist and dev.opera.com editor > Opera Software > > * Try our browsers: http://www.opera.com > * Learn to build a better web, with the Opera web standards curriculum: > http://www.opera.com/wsc > * Learn about the latest open standards technologies and techniques: > http://dev.opera.com > > > >
Received on Friday, 5 August 2011 08:58:22 UTC