- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 12:14:09 +0900
- To: John Colby <John.Colby@bcu.ac.uk>
- Cc: <public-evangelist@w3.org>
Hi John, John Colby (22 oct. 2007 - 17:57) : > From http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/programming-and-development/? > p=530&tag=nl.e138 > > Doesn’t give me much hope. Thanks for the article link. Could you give a bit more of context? On your personal expectations? Do you use the products cited in the article? Did you experience troubles and more important how did you solve them or tried to solve them? Noticing is good, but helping to move forward is better. For email, there was a W3C workshop recently about [HTML in email] [1]. During the workshop the designers have expressed their frustrations with regards to the support of html and css in email clients. They are willing to go full CSS, but they can't for now, and are forced to rely on table layout design. Another interesting statistics was also when you give the choice to all users to receive newsletters by email as text only or HTML, most of them (90%) request the HTML version. It seems with the new version of mailers we will see more and more HTML emails with predefined templates. A need for interoperability is quite important. One way to help is to create HTML test cases for authoring tools and to make report about the way tools and libraries are producing HTML. I had started a document in July about this, but I will be happy to had test and stuff from people. It might help to push implementers and also feed the HTML WG with some needs from the authoring tools. There might be requirements in the specification which are just difficult to handle in an authoring tool or a CMS. [1]: http://www.w3.org/2007/05/html-mail/ [2]: http://www.w3.org/2007/07/html-authoring-tools/ -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/ *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Tuesday, 23 October 2007 03:14:25 UTC