- From: David Dorward <david@dorward.me.uk>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 10:13:10 +0100
- To: sebastian nielsen <sebastiannielsen@hotmail.com>, public-evangelist@w3.org
On 26 Jun 2007, at 17:47, sebastian nielsen wrote: > A problem with the "standard" redirects is that they resubmit any > information that are submitted to a page that redirects. Really? The tip doesn't explicitly mention 303 redirects, but still... 10.3.4 303 See Other The response to the request can be found under a different URI and SHOULD be retrieved using a GET method on that resource. This method exists primarily to allow the output of a POST-activated script to redirect the user agent to a selected resource. The new URI is not a substitute reference for the originally requested resource. http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec10.html#sec10.3 ... however, as far as I know, pretty much all user agents treat 302 and 301 redirects as if they were 303 as far as converting to a GET request is concerned. -- David Dorward http://dorward.me.uk/ http://blog.dorward.me.uk/
Received on Thursday, 28 June 2007 09:13:42 UTC