- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 09:20:45 -0400
- To: "'public-evangelist@w3.org' w3. org" <public-evangelist@w3.org>
- Cc: "L.David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
Le 2005-09-21 à 12:18, Karl Dubost a écrit : > Test Suite Coverage, at least at W3C, it has improved tremendously > in the last 4 years. It was not part of the culture at the > beginning, it is now. Look at the Matrix for example. > http://www.w3.org/QA/TheMatrix > > If you want I could extract the list of all TS. I removed Primers, and Guidelines (like Web Arch for example) and try to condense when a TS addressed multiple Recs (modular Technology) TS = Test Suite Tech = A technology which can be published in multiple specs (for example OWL is 5 documents) * 1996 - 1 Tech - 0 TS * 1997 - 2 Tech - 0 TS * 1998 - 4 Tech - 3 TS * 1999 - 7 Tech - 4 TS * 2000 - 3 Tech - 1 TS * 2001 - 8 Tech - 3 TS * 2002 - 8 Tech - 2 TS * 2003 - 9 Tech - 6 TS * 2004 - 13 tech - 11 TS * 2005 - 4 tech - 4 TS Your mileage may vary depending on the way you count it's sometimes tricky. But data comes from the Matrix, if you want to verify. 2001 and 2002 were bad years. :((( -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Friday, 23 September 2005 13:21:34 UTC