- From: Douglas Clifton <dwclifton@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 16:07:50 -0500
- To: public-evangelist@w3.org
Sure, I understand your point. I was simply trying to state that there is more to it than an art, which alone implies less structure. "Principles" is good. On 11/22/05, Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk> wrote: > > Douglas Clifton wrote: > > > Art and Science of? > > Again, are we not risking an overly grandiose sounding name, with > possible "elitist" feel to it? I'd favour something more humble... > "principles" or maybe even "10 good things(tm) for web sites" :) > > -- > Patrick H. Lauke > __________________________________________________________ > re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively > [latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.] > www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk > http://redux.deviantart.com > __________________________________________________________ > Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force > http://webstandards.org/ > __________________________________________________________ > > -- Douglas Clifton dwclifton@gmail.com http://loadaveragezero.com/ http://loadaveragezero.com/app/s9y/ http://loadaveragezero.com/drx/rss/recent
Received on Tuesday, 22 November 2005 21:21:06 UTC