- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 14:15:15 -0400
- To: "'public-evangelist@w3.org' w3. org" <public-evangelist@w3.org>
Hi all, The last thread about how to inform people on the right choice of languages to use on your Web site was interesting. We are all prone to raise issues about the languages, we are using but not often good reasons to promote one language. Maybe a more positive way of promoting would be to promote choices in particular conditions. You are doing this, you can use HTML 4.01 You are doing that, you can use XHTML 1.0 etc. For each case, we could add the list of limitations in user agents and authoring tools implementation for each languages. The problems that people might encounter. It would help also to show what's not implemented in HTML 4.01 and XHTML 1.0 The mistake I identify each time is to say, you better to choose XHTML 1.0 upon HTML 4.01 or the opposite. It doesn't give much sense. As I said previously I'm using XHTML 1.0 because I need it, not because it's fancy. Jim, would it be in the line of a positive action? -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Wednesday, 25 May 2005 18:15:48 UTC