- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 14:51:41 -0500
- To: 'public-evangelist@w3.org' <public-evangelist@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 5 January 2005 22:36:29 UTC
Happy new year Angels, (the first one who calls me Charlie… will be sent on a dangerous mission ;) ) I know that there are on this list people who have done surveys of validity. I would like to know if someone has been curious enough to know to push a bit further by analyzing this: * Statistical Quantitative analysis (automatic) - Which HTML elements are used in Web pages? - Which frequency ? - Are valid Web pages richer than non-valid ones. (bigger varieties of HTML element) - The same for attribute * Qualitative analysis (human) - Are the elements and the attributes used appropriately? - Is it NOT possible to define the proper use? I think that would be interesting to do that kind of study in people running classes too. At the beginning of a HTML class and at the end of a HTML class to see if the students understand the meaning of HTML and what's really useful for them in the language. -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Wednesday, 5 January 2005 22:36:29 UTC