- From: Ant <ant@net-pixie.com>
- Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2004 00:31:43 +0000
- To: public-evangelist@w3.org
I would like to offer a different take on this debate. Whatever education and certification is to be offered (if any) must in some part be related to the perceived requirements of the people being educated. The outreach program is therefore the first step (to create this perceived need). As Karl has already stated: People use "something" because they have a reason to do so. Among them, it can be: - Ethics (weak) - Fun (weak) - Practical personal benefits (strong) - Benefits for other persons (strong) Surely increasing consumer awareness would create the necessary market drive for web professionals to want/need to be able to adhere to standards and best practice? At the end of the day, the CEO of my company wants me to give the client what they want. If a client asked about standards compliance and accessibility then the fact that I could provide those things might make me more of an asset to the company, at present those things are as irrelevant as my favourite band. If a perceived need such as that for "search engine optimisation" could be created, then the outreach problem would be solved. A vendor neutral organisation such as the W3C would be ideal for marketing a "web site buyers guide".
Received on Saturday, 27 November 2004 00:32:10 UTC