- From: ed nixon <ed.nixon@lynnparkplace.org>
- Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 20:01:24 -0500
- To: public-evangelist@w3.org
- CC: molly@molly.com
Molly E. Holzschlag wrote: > > I've been online in some fashion since the early BBS days and I feel no need > to be anywhere near flames. With respect Molly: If you've been on line for so long, perhaps you should be inured to the flame. Of course, there is no excuse for rudeness, there is always a way to make a point in a positive and productive way. But my long experience tells me that rudeness will always exist and particularly so among those who breath the rare (sometimes toxic) gases that form the atmosphere of standardization (and advocacy) communities. I'm sorry you were hurt and I'm sorry you are still feeling bruised; I'm also sorry there couldn't seem to be an apology of any sort. But such is life. Time to move on? I'm not sure how one would change the air in this list. It seems to oscillate from being a W3C insider vehicle to a still born religious movement to discrete silence. Maybe we have enough "standards" already and it's time to focus on making them meaningful and relevant to the beleaguered work-a-day web stiff. For example, I put up a post a couple of weeks ago about methodology and it's immaturity / inadequacy and saw no traffic out of it whatsoever. You can throw in your hook and hope for a bite, but throwing in a bomb and watching the fish surface is really not to the point. ...edN
Received on Saturday, 20 November 2004 01:01:26 UTC