- From: Tom Gilder <tom@tom.me.uk>
- Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 11:17:12 +0000
- To: public-evangelist@w3.org
On Wednesday, January 15, 2003, 4:40:23 PM, Alex Rousskov wrote: > This not testable and, hence, is not enforceable, of course. There is > no way to verify whether _all_ raised issues were addressed because > there is no practical way to find _all_ raised issues unless WG > maintains an apropriate interface, such as a bugzilla database (in > addition to informal mailing lists). I feel interaction between working groups and the general public could be improved dramatically. What about having working groups being required to issue a monthly newsletter stating what they have done in plain English? Requesting feedback on issues? Other than answering questions on the public mailing lists and drafts from time to time, I feel we actually get reasonably little feedback directly from the WGs. And also, couldn't we have scheduled real-time public meetings? Public IRC discussions? That would allow direct conversation and interaction between members and the public, and would be fantastic imo. Cheers -- Tom Gilder http://tom.me.uk/
Received on Thursday, 16 January 2003 06:17:34 UTC