- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 17:01:34 -0400
- To: public-evangelist@w3.org
Hi, In March 2003, we have tried to start to collect information[1] for a Note that would be the companion of CHIPS[2] and CUAP[3]. Unfortunately, we don't think there's enough material to create such a document. A few issues arise when we start to collect a few guidelines for such a document. What's an authoring tool: Wysiwyg? plain text? Script generating pages? libraries? Converter? Once you have addressed the fact to produce valid content. What are the other issues? Should we recommend scenarios when they are not defined in the specifications? Which technologies? All these issues are complex and sometimes do not have a single answer. I would encourage people to review W3C specifications and question the editorial part. - old specs: What's missing? - new specs: Should we ask for more details on the editing techniques part? So except if there's an important number of contribution, We decided to not create such a document. PS: For accessibility problems with regards to Authoring Tools. See http://www.w3.org/TR/ATAG10/ Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-evangelist/2003Mar/0003 [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/chips [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/cuap -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Monday, 25 August 2003 17:01:36 UTC