- From: Tristan Nitot <nitot@netscape.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 08:58:16 -0400 (EDT)
- CC: public-evangelist@w3.org
Don XML a écrit: > The problem with ASP.Net is that they wanted it to render in almost > any downlevel browser (like Netscape 3), so they sacrificed sticking > to known standards. interesting... > Plus, the site I'm using is hosted (for free) by someone else. I'm > working with others on an open source blogging system written in .Net, > and that one I'm doing my best to make sure it validates. Err, I'm not sure you are interested, but for the bloggers among the list, I just started to use B2 (GPL, available for free from http://cafelog.com ), which produces valid XHTML 1.0 transitional content out of the "box". I've installed it in 10 minutes on a very cheap hosting service ($15 per year), http://apinc.org It's quite interesting. Having something similar in the .Net world is indeed a good thing. --Tristan -- http://openweb.eu.org/ http://standblog.com/
Received on Friday, 25 April 2003 09:01:57 UTC