- From: Andrew McFarland <andrew.mcfarland@unite.net>
- Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 16:08:26 +0100
- To: public-evangelist@w3.org
At 10:38 25/09/2002 -0400, Eric A. Meyer wrote: > In the first place, an effort of the kind I undertook isn't one of > tens or hundreds of hours. I invested less than three hours in fixing > the DOM scripting and tweaking a bit of HTML, and I'm not even a DOM > expert. I think the amount of time is very much dependant on how the site is generated, and how much of the site needs fixed. A dynamically generated site can be very easy to fix, or an absolute nightmare, depending on the underlying programming. I recently fixed up a small site, entirely static HTML, for one of our clients. The markup was completely unstructured and it took me the best part of a working week to get it to the stage where CSS could be applied with consistency. Were you thinking of individual page fixes or whole site corrections? <snip/> > As for the benefit to you, Don't worry, I wasn't being completely mercenary :-). I live an annoyingly busy life at the moment, and whereas I would be happy to work on projects for the good of the Internet as a whole, I am reluctant to spend a lot of time fixing a commercial website for free. A few hours per week on commercial websites would be OK. Andrew -- Andrew McFarland UNITE Solutions Phone 028 9077 7338 http://www.unite.net/ Fax 028 9077 7313
Received on Wednesday, 25 September 2002 11:12:46 UTC